Re: [SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1
From: John Pettigrew (john_at_xl-cambridge.com)
Date: 07/25/03
- Previous message: Paul Cooke: "Re: [SLE] To SuSE: Re: REPORT SUBMITTED REGARDING: ted.harding@nessie.mcc."
- In reply to: James Ogley: "[SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Next in thread: James Ogley: "Re: [SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Reply: James Ogley: "Re: [SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:39:25 +0100 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
In a previous message, James Ogley <james@usr-local-bin.org> wrote:
> I've been gradually build more and more core GNOME components, and have now
> decided to take the next step, and produce a drop-in replacement for SuSE's
> default GNOME setup.
How easy would it be to revert if I didn't like the way you've got things set
up? Or would it be better to try it on a non-production box first?
BTW, which themes have you used for the screenshot of your Gnome? And are
these Gtk+Qt themes, or Gtk only?
John
-- John Pettigrew Headstrong Games john@headstrong-games.co.uk Fun : Strategy : Price http://www.headstrong-games.co.uk/ Board games that won't break the bank -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Paul Cooke: "Re: [SLE] To SuSE: Re: REPORT SUBMITTED REGARDING: ted.harding@nessie.mcc."
- In reply to: James Ogley: "[SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Next in thread: James Ogley: "Re: [SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Reply: James Ogley: "Re: [SLE] Announcing ULB GNOME 0.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]