Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering
From: Curtis Rey (crrey_at_charter.net)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Charles Philip Chan: "Re: [SLE] memory management vs. 'top' utility - SuSE 8.0"
- In reply to: Ben Rosenberg: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Next in thread: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Reply: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:21:01 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:44 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
> * BandiPat (penguin0601@earthlink.net) [030730 21:02]:
> >Running glxinfo shows no direct rendering and gears are slow and Tux
> >Racer is slow. The 7200 is about the same as the 7000 card, so it
> >doesn't fit into the "need an ATI binary driver" to get the 3d working.
> >In fact, I believe the standard XFree86 4.3 supports 3d for the Radeons
> >up to the 9200, but beyond that you need the binary drivers.
> >
> >Any thoughts anyone? Has someone run across this lately as well?
>
> Well, I've posted about this weird happening before. It seems that every
> 25-35 days of uptime..give or take..my Radeon 7500 just stops being able
> to use Direct Rendering. I run 3Ddiag and make sure everything is kosher
> but the only thing that fixes it is a reboot. I've tried everything from
> removing the modules to running SaX2 ..etc..etc. Nothing works accept a
> reboot. Then all is peachy for the next month or so. I've never had an
> answer that came close to being correct about this issue. It never
> cropped up while I was using my nVidia based Diamond Viper 770 Ultra
> which has made me thing that my next card may be an nVidia FX card. If
> anyone has thoughts on this ..I to would LOVE to hear them.
>
> --
> Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org
Ben, which FX card are you getting. I was thinking about getting a GF4-Ti
(4200 or 4600) but it isn't DX9 enabled. I want this for HalfLife2 and Doom3
(though Carmack will most likely port of OSS/Linux - shaders are writing in
an assmebly like manner). My problem is that HL2 uses some advance
mipmapping, shader, and fog protocals. It should really bump up the bench
mark, but it is DX9 dependent. Any thoughts?
Cheers, Curtis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/KKdIiqnGhdjCOJsRAsx4AJ9RNK8H50yMLLy1LeRxm4Wu4yJPYwCfQlTV
hbY2zY7tOxx3vaeDcqfUhIc=
=4PVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Charles Philip Chan: "Re: [SLE] memory management vs. 'top' utility - SuSE 8.0"
- In reply to: Ben Rosenberg: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Next in thread: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Reply: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] 3D & direct rendering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|