Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]
From: H du Plooy (linuser_at_ananzi.co.za)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: S. Bulterman: "Re: [SLE] Stock postgres"
- In reply to: H du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin"
- Next in thread: Tom Nielsen: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]...add on question"
- Reply: Tom Nielsen: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]...add on question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: SuSE-linux-e List <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: 31 Jul 2003 22:48:18 +0200
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 01:39, H du Plooy wrote:
> Currently scores of 5 or higher are accepted as spam, while most of the
> stuff I tested were quite lowerwer (as low as 2) and were definitely
> spam. What do you oaks use for a limit?
>
> Where do I set this?
Thanks for all who helped out on this folks. Ignore the above
question. I figured out why 5 didn't work. I tested it by forwarding a
bunch of the spam I had received to myself, which seems to have
decreased the scores quite a bit, and only the mails with most tell tale
signs were caught.
All the spam I have received since have been caught out faultlessly.
This is really awesome!
Thank you!
Hans
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: S. Bulterman: "Re: [SLE] Stock postgres"
- In reply to: H du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin"
- Next in thread: Tom Nielsen: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]...add on question"
- Reply: Tom Nielsen: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]...add on question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
