Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]...add on question
From: Tom Nielsen (Tom_at_Neuro-Logic.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Thomas G Land: "[SLE] Konqueror SuSE Pro 8.1 vs 7.3"
- In reply to: H du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: SuSE-linux-e List <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: 31 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0700
I have a question....
Does a higher score reduce spam or label it as not spam?
My web host uses spamassassin. I've been getting a lot of spam lately,
so I changed the value from 3 to 2.5 in an attempt to reduce it. It
didn't seem to help. My question is, am I allowing more spam thru????
Thanks,
Tom
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 13:48, H du Plooy wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 01:39, H du Plooy wrote:
> > Currently scores of 5 or higher are accepted as spam, while most of the
> > stuff I tested were quite lowerwer (as low as 2) and were definitely
> > spam. What do you oaks use for a limit?
> >
> > Where do I set this?
>
> Thanks for all who helped out on this folks. Ignore the above
> question. I figured out why 5 didn't work. I tested it by forwarding a
> bunch of the spam I had received to myself, which seems to have
> decreased the scores quite a bit, and only the mails with most tell tale
> signs were caught.
>
> All the spam I have received since have been caught out faultlessly.
> This is really awesome!
>
> Thank you!
> Hans
-- Tom Nielsen Neuro Logic Systems 805.389.5435 x18 www.neuro-logic.com
- Previous message: Thomas G Land: "[SLE] Konqueror SuSE Pro 8.1 vs 7.3"
- In reply to: H du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin [solved]"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] senmail+spamassassin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|