Re: [SLE] libphp4.so?

From: Curtis Rey (crrey_at_charter.net)
Date: 08/13/03

  • Next message: Anders Norrbring: "[SLE] Mailman not receiving mail?"
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:22:26 -0500
    
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Tuesday 12 August 2003 05:20 pm, Philipp Thomas wrote:
    > The Wizard <markea@earthlink.net> [Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:16:44 -0700]:
    > >I saw the Apache/libphp4.so error after I upgraded to the newer GCC 3.3
    > >from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects (the 8.2 GCC gave "prerelease" in the
    > >version message) and fixed it by re-installing libgcc-3.3-43.i586.rpm and
    > >running "ldconfig" .
    >
    > Yes, gcc needs more than one package to be usable. These packages form the
    > base on which all other packages build:
    >
    > libgcc (shared runtime support library)
    > cpp (preprocessor, actually the C frontend as there is no separate
    > preprocessor anymore).
    > gcc (compiler driver, gcc specific headers etc.)
    >
    > This base is all you need if you only want to compile C Programs.
    >
    > All following package sets need the C compiler, i.e. must be installed in
    > addition to the above base packages.
    >
    > C++:
    >
    > gcc-c++ (compiler driver plus C++ frontend)
    > libstdc++ (standard C++ library, shared libraries only)
    > libstdc++-devel (static libraries and header files)
    >
    > Fortran77:
    >
    > gcc-g77
    >
    > Java:
    >
    > gcc-java (java compiler)
    > libgcj (java libraries, shared version only)
    > libgcj-devel (headers, static libraries, symlinks for linking)
    >
    > Ada:
    >
    > gnat (nearly complete Ada development package)
    > gnat-runtime (ADA shared runtime libraries)
    >
    > Objective C:
    >
    > gcc-objc (objective C frontend)
    > libobjc (libraries, headers etc.)
    >
    > And independently from the rest the documentation in texinfo format:
    >
    > gcc-info
    >
    >
    > Maybe I should expand the README to make it clear which packages are
    > needed?
    >
    > Philipp

    I had installed all the packages via the project/gcc directory weeks ago and
    followed the instruction posted on both the website and the README.

    rpm -qa | grep cpp
    cpp-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep gcc
    gcc-c++-3.3-43
    libgcc-3.3-43
    gcc-g77-3.3-43
    gcc-info-3.3-43
    gcc-java-3.3-43
    gcc-objc-3.3-43
    gcc-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep libgcc
    libgcc-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep libgcj
    libgcj-3.3-43
    libgcj-devel-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep libgcj-devel
    libgcj-devel-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep gcc-g77
    gcc-g77-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep libstdc
    libstdc++-3.3-43
    libstdc++-devel-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep gcc-java
    gcc-java-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep gcc-objc
    gcc-objc-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep libobjc
    libobjc-3.3-43

    rpm -qa | grep gccinfo

    nada zip zilch.

    After updating the new kernel via rpm as suggested in the announcement and via
    yast the NVIDIA drivers (kernel/GLX) won't install via the installer, sources
    rpms under rebuild give the following:

    *** Failed cc sanity check. Bailing out! ***
    make: *** [gcc-check] Error 1
    + exit 0
    Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.51101
    + umask 022
    + cd /usr/src/packages/BUILD
    + cd NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4496
    + rm -f /tmp/files.lst
    + '[' -z '' ']'
    ++ uname -r
    + export TARGET_KERNEL=2.4.20-4GB-athlon
    + TARGET_KERNEL=2.4.20-4GB-athlon
    + '[' -d /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel ']'
    + INSTALLPATH=/lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    + mkdir -p
    /var/tmp/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0//lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    + install -m 0444 nvidia.o
    /var/tmp/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0//lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    install: cannot stat `nvidia.o': No such file or directory
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.51101 (%install)

    But the GLX drivers will rebuild, but an rpm -ba for the GLX returns the
    essentially the same as above:

    *** Failed cc sanity check. Bailing out! ***
    make: *** [gcc-check] Error 1
    + exit 0
    Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57628
    + umask 022
    + cd /usr/src/packages/BUILD
    + cd NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4496
    + rm -f /tmp/files.lst
    + '[' -z '' ']'
    ++ uname -r
    + export TARGET_KERNEL=2.4.20-4GB-athlon
    + TARGET_KERNEL=2.4.20-4GB-athlon
    + '[' -d /lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel ']'
    + INSTALLPATH=/lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    + mkdir -p
    /var/tmp/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0//lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    + install -m 0444 nvidia.o
    /var/tmp/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0//lib/modules/2.4.20-4GB-athlon/kernel/drivers/video
    install: cannot stat `nvidia.o': No such file or directory
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57628 (%install)

    This also happens with most others sources/src.rpm's. The strange thing is
    that this is a recent occurance. It didn't give me problems until early this
    week <shrugs>

    Cheers, Curtis.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQE/OZLUiqnGhdjCOJsRAvXbAJ4hN3nzP5wp2UZmE1vhkKVRpfXmPACeP2FY
    43e+5LnLtAU3yVAdWRaMknM=
    =pGDo
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Anders Norrbring: "[SLE] Mailman not receiving mail?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Redhat upgrade problem - packages fail rpm -Va
      ... > being owned by multiple packages, ... # rpm -V up2date ... {Only config files in verify error list. ... We can lean something from Microsoft's install process. ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: how to add rpm ?
      ... > I have install Fc2 from NFS. ... Get yourself a good installation of "apt for rpm." ... This will upgrade all existing packages on your system. ...
      (Fedora)
    • FW: [SLE] YaST Online Update Problem
      ... >>update one of the rpms manually to see if rpm will give you a better error ... >SuSE to try to apply one of the patches? ... >I've always used YaST for Online Updates and for installing new packages. ... Not only that, but at the end of the install, it ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: How to install Java/Frefox in FC6 -
      ... just don't trust java and rpm in the same breath, ... recall that when building packages, you always opt for ./configure && ... make && make install and I don't recall a single instance where you have ... I rebuilt kde to kde-3.3.0 using konstruct, didn't fix it. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Redhat upgrade problem - packages fail rpm -Va
      ... > being owned by multiple packages, ... # rpm -V up2date ... {Only config files in verify error list. ... We can lean something from Microsoft's install process. ...
      (linux.redhat.install)