Re: [SLE] hptraid module building
From: Philipp Thomas (philipp.thomas_at_t-link.de)
Date: 08/30/03
- Previous message: Terence McCarthy: "Re: [SLE] Why have swap"
- In reply to: Richard: "[SLE] hptraid module building"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:53:20 +0200
Richard <rick47@adelphia.net> [Fri, 29 Aug 2003 22:27:21 -0700]:
>I am trying to build a module to run an HPT372N chip. The HPT site has
>pre-built modules and kernels for SuSE 8.1 and lower, but not 8.2. They do
>provide an open source module download.
The heart of the driver is only provided as a binary object, so this isn't
an open source driver, no matter what HighPoint calls it! This is a binary
only driver just like the NVidia drivers!
>trying to build the module for my SuSE 8.2-athlon system. It seems no matter
>what I do the module built, when I try to insmod it to see if it will load,
>gives an error saying it was built for -2.4.20-4GB while I am running
>-2.4.20-athlon.
Do As follows:
- Install the package kernel-source.
- cd /usr/src/linux
- make cloneconfig
- make dep
After that, compile the driver again and now it should be possible to
insert it without problems.
Note that I'd stay away from the HighPoint driver because it doesn't offer
anything that the normal IDE driver in combination with hptraid and the
software RAID driver can't provide. And the latter *are* open source.
So I'd rather try to patch the kernel (as detailed in
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0303.2/0487.html and the next
in thread) than use HighPoints driver.
Philipp
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Terence McCarthy: "Re: [SLE] Why have swap"
- In reply to: Richard: "[SLE] hptraid module building"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- RE: PATCH - InfiniBand Access Layer (IBAL)
... with duplicate code for the access layer and most of the ULPs ... the foundation
of infiniband support will be the Access Layer, ... We also need an open source driver.
... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: Opinion: NVIDIA drivers are a BAD Thing [tm]
... >>effort to support open source companies. ... > for a decent card,
read a review on a linux site that said mid-range ... > and every driver except the
windows driver on the cd in the box. ... (Fedora) - Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]
... They dont HAVE to release a video driver ... >> that Linux was
a market share that they wanted. ... > Free isn't even close to open source. ...
I disagree with your statement that ... (Fedora) - Re: Supported Video Cards under Free Software
... reason we can't get a "good" open source driver. ... the nuts and bolts of sending
data to hardware (various ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
... (Debian-User) - Re: solved: 2.6.23 && fglrx && s2ram
... happily switch to a open source one once it properly runs mplayer, ... Renaming
the config options for suspend/sleep broke fglrx power ... It looks like your patch is
against the fglrx driver, ... The vendor has his own forums and support channels.
... (Linux-Kernel)