Re: [SLE] Spamc, lock files and kmail

From: Charles Philip Chan (cpchan_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 08/31/03

  • Next message: will: "Re: [SLE] For or against ..Hyperthreading." 
    Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:12:34 -0400
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com

    --Z:wse1o,YLnKw'=.
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:06:48 -0700
    David Herman <mesamoo115@attbi.com> wrote:

    > I've read the spamassasin docs but I don't see any info about how to
    > setup a "lock" file, especially in conjunction w/ kmail.

    This is not the job of spamassassin (on a dedicated mail server you
    certain want more than 1 mail processed at a time). It is the job of the
    Kmail (in your case) to limit the copies of spamc being run
    concurrently.

    > Can this be done with kmail? If so how.

    Don't know, haven't used Kmail in a long time. Maybe you will have
    better luck on suse-kde. If it can't be done, you should consider
    file a bug report/feature request at bugs.kde.org.

    Charles 

    -- 
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years
of careful development."
(By dmeggins@aix1.uottawa.ca)
--Z:wse1o,YLnKw'=.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ula+3epPyyKbwPYRAmC9AKCWtRJbrrSPQdFKY86f9OwgsprRYgCffsrb
jdOotRVgd9i1/XEEjufdMIQ=
=to6X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Z:wse1o,YLnKw'=.--
  • Next message: will: "Re: [SLE] For or against ..Hyperthreading."