[SLE] 'nohup' ??? AKA [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?
From: Bernd (bernd_at_covenantmail.net)
Date: 09/03/03
- Previous message: Thinker: "Re: [SLE] apt on a clean SuSE 8.2 (error)"
- In reply to: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] 'nohup' ??? AKA [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] 'nohup' ??? AKA [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:15:52 -0700
In reading about debugging, I accidently came upon the 'nohup' invocation,
which makes a command immune to hangups.
Anyone have any suggestions about running 'nohup'??? Thoughts about running
it with pppd??? Can I still manually disconnect without hassle???
Bernd
-- "If you want to build a ship, don't drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea." Antoine de St. Exupery -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Thinker: "Re: [SLE] apt on a clean SuSE 8.2 (error)"
- In reply to: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] 'nohup' ??? AKA [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] 'nohup' ??? AKA [SLE] Works in Windoze, NOT in SuSE!?!?!?!?!?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]