Re: [SLE] Installing NVidia drivers failing
From: Carlos E. R. (robin1.listas_at_tiscali.es)
Date: 09/06/03
- Previous message: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] WHat hapened to the sdb?"
- In reply to: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] Installing NVidia drivers failing"
- Next in thread: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] Installing NVidia drivers failing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 02:48:22 +0200 (CEST) To: SuSE List <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
The 03.09.05 at 23:46, Philipp Thomas wrote:
> >make cloneconfig dep
>
> Better make that two steps:
>
> make cloneconfig
> make dep
>
> The reason is the way the extra version we tag on the version string (UP or
> SMP and 4GB vs. 64GB) is created in the makefile of older kernels.
Then, when I use (for example):
make dep bzImage modules
Should I better make it three distinct commands, or is it indifferent? I
thought make executed them in succession, so that both styles were
equivalent, with less typping the first one - and in the case of slow
cpus, convenient.
Or are they executed in parallel?
--
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] WHat hapened to the sdb?"
- In reply to: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] Installing NVidia drivers failing"
- Next in thread: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] Installing NVidia drivers failing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|