Re: [SLE] Re: Gaim
From: Anders Karlsson (anders_at_trudheim.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Gaim"
- In reply to: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Gaim"
- Next in thread: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Gaim"
- Reply: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Gaim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "SuSE (E-mail)" <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:34:12 +0100
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:41, John Pettigrew wrote:
> In a previous message, James Ogley <james@usr-local-bin.org> wrote:
> > Or, just wait till later in the day, and get my updated Gaim packages :)
>
> Once the static version is available, is there any disadvantage to moving to
> this version and removing the mozilla entry from ld.so.conf?
None whatsoever apart from the statically linked gaim taking a little
more disk-space. And then you can remove the mozilla entry from
ld.so.conf as well... :-)
Regards,
-- Anders Karlsson <anders@trudheim.com> Trudheim Technology Limited
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Gaim"
- In reply to: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Gaim"
- Next in thread: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Gaim"
- Reply: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Gaim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]