Re: [SLE] Re: Re: Gaim

From: Ken Schneider (kschneider_at_rtsx.com)
Date: 09/30/03

  • Next message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Re: Gaim" 
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:14:18 -0400

    On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 07:11, John Pettigrew wrote:
    > In a previous message, Anders Karlsson <anders@trudheim.com> wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:41, John Pettigrew wrote:
    > > > Once the static version is available, is there any disadvantage to moving
    > > > to this version and removing the mozilla entry from ld.so.conf?
    > >

        vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
    > > None whatsoever apart from the statically linked gaim taking a little more
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    > > disk-space. And then you can remove the mozilla entry from ld.so.conf as
    > > well... :-)
    >
    > That's my point - is there any disadvantage to this extra entry in ld.so.conf?
    >
    > John

    The whole point is that a statically linked program will be larger then
    a dynamically linked one. There is no disadvantage if this is the only
    program that requires this library. 

    -- 
Ken Schneider
unix user since 1989
linux user since 1994
SuSE user since 1998
-- 
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
  • Next message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: Re: Gaim"