[SLE] Virtual server

From: Joćo Reis (joao.reis_at_2000comp.pt)
Date: 10/17/03

  • Next message: Paul Trevethan: "[SLE] Strange DNS problem"
    Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:34:40 +0100
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    
    

    Hi to all

    Is it eficient, or better, is it fesible to have a rsync process running
    every 2 minutes to syncronized backup
    server disks?

    I have the following configuration

    SERVER A ----------- SERVER B

    Server A has two disks. Main disk and a server B backup disk
    Server B has two disks. Main disk and server A backup disk

    The four disks are equal.
    The two servers are directly connected to each other (interface A to
    interface B).

    Thanks to all

    P.S: My objective is to build a similar RAID1 disk but that one of the
    disks is located in another computer.

    -- 
        \|/   "Do or do not. There is no try" - Yoda   \|/
         |==============================================|
         | 2000Comp - Consultoria e Informįtica, Lda    |
         | Tel:  +351 22 941 99 32                      |
     \|/ | Fax:  +351 22 941 99 34                      | \|/
      O  | www:  http://www.2000comp.pt                 |  O
     -|--|                                              |--|-
     \|  | Joćo Reis                                    |  |/
     / \ |==============================================| / \
    ==========================================================
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Paul Trevethan: "[SLE] Strange DNS problem"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: External Backup without blocking the database
      ... only a backup done when server is blocked by ... the view of IDS server. ... checkpoint before it shuts down. ... puts all things to disk so that disks are physically ...
      (comp.databases.informix)
    • Re: Network not responding on idle SCO 5.0.5 system.
      ... server and the second is a hot spare. ... I advised the client to reboot the live system and leave the ... backup server alone until I returned to my office to attempt to ... Both disks of RAID1 ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)
    • Re: ESE performance errors
      ... How is your server architected? ... Are you using a NAS or DAS for disks? ... Backup window at all. ... There appears to be nothing wrong with the server's hardware. ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
    • Re: [SLE] Machine Building - Nightmare Alley - Compatibility and Upgrade
      ... On the other side I've been using Gigabyte boards with SuSE for years no ... graphic cards as the server terminal stays in text mode anyway. ... > department) that I will have to install their SuSe 9.1 distribution from ... Disks have a limited life time... ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Unix runs faster, maybe (was: Re: Educating potential VMS users)
      ... That's what I just suggested, Kerry: they're limited by disk I/O, not CPU, and hence CPU utilization *will* be low, even if the disks are working their little tails off. ... A server with very low CPU utilization is a *good* candidate for virtualization, since it's got lots of horsepower left over for other tasks that admins might be reluctant to run on the same OS instance: just hook up some more disks to service the added applicationand let 'er rip. ...
      (comp.os.vms)