[SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia
From: John Pettigrew (john_at_xl-cambridge.com)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- In reply to: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Next in thread: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Reply: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:55:02 +0000 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
In a previous message, "Art Fore" <afore@sonic.net> wrote:
> John Pettigrew wrote:
> > If you drive an LCD at over its physical resolution, you lose clarity.
> >
> It is like comparing the same 8X10 photograph printed on a 300 dpi laser
> printer verssus printed on a 1200 dpi laserprinter.
No it isn't - if the LCD only has (say) 1280x1024 physical resolution, driving
at a higher resolution will actually reduce the clarity and precision of the
display, not increase it. It's the disadvantage of LCDs compared with CRTs -
they don't work well at arbitrary resolutions.
John
-- John Pettigrew Headstrong Games john@headstrong-games.co.uk Fun : Strategy : Price http://www.headstrong-games.co.uk/ Board games that won't break the bank Knossos: escape the ever-changing labyrinth before the Minotaur catches you!
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- In reply to: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Next in thread: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Reply: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|