Re: [SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia
From: Art Fore (afore_at_sonic.net)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Damon Register: "[SLE] SuSE 9.0 is very nice"
- In reply to: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Next in thread: Gerhard den Hollander: "Re: [SLE] Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 04:32:51 -0800 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
John Pettigrew wrote:
>In a previous message, "Art Fore" <afore@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>>John Pettigrew wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If you drive an LCD at over its physical resolution, you lose clarity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>It is like comparing the same 8X10 photograph printed on a 300 dpi laser
>>printer verssus printed on a 1200 dpi laserprinter.
>>
>>
>
>No it isn't - if the LCD only has (say) 1280x1024 physical resolution, driving
>at a higher resolution will actually reduce the clarity and precision of the
>display, not increase it. It's the disadvantage of LCDs compared with CRTs -
>they don't work well at arbitrary resolutions.
>
>John
>
>
I was comparing a 1024X768 resolution screen with a 1920X1600 screen (or
it could be 1600X1200) and having the text and window displays sized so
the are about the same between the two. If you take the 1920X1600
display and drive it with 1024Xww768, as when SuSE was first installed
using frame bufferes before the nvidia drivers are installed, what you
say is correct and the lcd actually is not used on a about an inch on
both sides due to the aspect ratio.
Art
- Previous message: Damon Register: "[SLE] SuSE 9.0 is very nice"
- In reply to: John Pettigrew: "[SLE] Re: Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Next in thread: Gerhard den Hollander: "Re: [SLE] Re: 9.0 and nVidia"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|