[SLE] Re: Re: Re: "transcode"? "Protected"?
From: John Pettigrew (john_at_xl-cambridge.com)
Date: 12/08/03
- Previous message: Daniel Purdy: "[SLE] Question on Sound pci = acpi"
- In reply to: Dennis J. Tuchler: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: "transcode"? "Protected"?"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: "transcode"? "Protected"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:38:16 +0000 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
In a previous message, "Dennis J. Tuchler" <dennis.tuchler@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> Before taking one of the alternatives offered by SuSE, I need to know what
> is at stake. What is the effect of not "sending" transcode "to
> Protected"?
If you leave transcode Protected, your system will have rpm conflicts, which
will make it harder and harder for you to get your system working stably as
you install new software.
If you don't use transcode (which, in case you don't know, is for
translating video files from one format to another) then I'd set it to
Unprotected and let YaST uninstall it.
John
-- John Pettigrew Headstrong Games john@headstrong-games.co.uk Fun : Strategy : Price http://www.headstrong-games.co.uk/ Board games that won't break the bank Knossos: escape the ever-changing labyrinth before the Minotaur catches you!
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Daniel Purdy: "[SLE] Question on Sound pci = acpi"
- In reply to: Dennis J. Tuchler: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: "transcode"? "Protected"?"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Re: Re: "transcode"? "Protected"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|