[SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri
From: Nick Selby (ns_at_nickselby.com)
Date: 12/31/03
- Previous message: Charles Love: "Re: [SLE] Font Question - where to change"
- Next in thread: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Reply: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Reply: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:51:44 +0100
Hi,
It seems that the latest spate of spam is loaded with seemingly arbitrary
words to defeat the Baysian processes of SpamAssassin, such as
"thayer earsplitting fatal scatterbrain landfill circumstance configuration
dowling system smokescreen incompletion oscillatory burgeon boorish mallow
repudiate elysee bermuda cohort upbring unix bitnet depressive enigma"
I guess that they're doing this to increase the message size with un-spamlike
words to decrease the ratio of spam-like words to non-spam-like words? Does
this sound right? Anyone heard of this and/or have a sense of how to defeat
this strategy with current available configurable settings on SA? Spastic?
Anything?
TIA
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Charles Love: "Re: [SLE] Font Question - where to change"
- Next in thread: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Reply: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Reply: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] OT - SA defeating thesauri"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]