Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner
From: Verdi March (cincaipatron_at_gmx.net)
Date: 01/06/04
- Previous message: Charles Philip Chan: "Re: [SLE] Non-printing workaround"
- In reply to: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Next in thread: Felix Miata: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Reply: Felix Miata: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:17:36 +0100 (MET) To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I don't know why
> YaST (or Parted) was unable to read the partition table, since I had no
> problem booting or mounting those filesystems (root, /home, /usr/local).
What's your linux filesystem? Is it ext2 or reiser or something else?
One reason I always use ext2 is because pqmagic only supports
ext2. So far I encountered no corruption problem (it's not like I
repartition every day ;-), except that linux's fdisk (e.g. to set active
partition) will "correct" the order of partition.
Rgds,
Verdi
-- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Charles Philip Chan: "Re: [SLE] Non-printing workaround"
- In reply to: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Next in thread: Felix Miata: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Reply: Felix Miata: "Re: [SLE] Partition Magic vs. Linux partitioner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|