Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir
isofroni_at_cc.uoi.gr
Date: 01/27/04
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- In reply to: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:34:06 +0200 To: "suse-linux-e@suse.com" <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
Αρχικό μήνυμα από "Carlos E. R." <robin1.listas@tiscali.es>:
>
> The Tuesday 2004-01-27 at 10:35 +0200, isofroni@cc.uoi.gr wrote:
>
> > Alright, it finally worked.
>
> Good! :-)
>
> >
> > Another issue is about spamassassin "decisions" for the same mail.
> > Two similar mails can score different points (one paased and the other
> failed)
> >
> > Do you know why is that happening?
>
> Look carefully at the report - this can be hidden as headers, or in clear
> text. For one that passed, you will see something like this:
>
> |X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
> | nimrodel.valinor
> |X-Spam-Level: ****
> |X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_90,MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX
> | autolearn=no version=2.61
>
> This one got 4.8 points, less than 5, so it passed; You can see the tests
> that indicate the level of "spamminess".
>
> For one marked as spam, there is a report in clear (or no report, depends
> on your personal configuration), giving details of each test. First, the
> headers:
>
> |X-Spam-Flag: YES
> |X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
> | nimrodel.valinor
> |X-Spam-Level: **********
> |X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.1 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_99,MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX,
> | NIGERIAN_BODY1 autolearn=no version=2.61
>
> And then, the report:
>
> |Content analysis details: (10.1 points, 5.0 required)
> |
> | pts rule name description
> |---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> | 2.7 MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary
> | 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
> | [score: 1.0000]
> | 2.0 NIGERIAN_BODY1 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message
> 1+
>
>
>
>
> Finally, you can do more things. You can "teach" the bayesian filter about
> what you consider spam and what not - you will find details about this on
> spamassassin documentation, because it is long to explain. It has been
> commented as well on the list many times, simply browse the list archive
> looking for spam or bayes in the subject line.
>
> Look also at the unofficial SuSE FAQ.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Carlos Robinson
>
>
> --
> Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
> Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
> Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
>
>
>
I would also like to ask you if i can change the spam file , where the spams are
achived.
For example if my user test receive a spam the procmail is going to create a
file
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$HOME/Mail/in_spam
in_spam with the default onwership root:root
Can be that changed during the creation, because i have to change the ownership
for every user receives a spam for a first time.
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- In reply to: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Procmail + Maildir"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
