Re: [SLE] Top posting (WAS: Re: [SLE] Printing quality)
From: Patrick Shanahan (paka_at_wahoo.no-ip.org)
Date: 01/27/04
- Previous message: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] Top posting"
- In reply to: Paul W. Abrahams: "[SLE] Top posting (WAS: Re: [SLE] Printing quality)"
- Next in thread: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] Top posting (WAS: Re: [SLE] Printing quality)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 14:48:01 -0500 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
* Paul W. Abrahams <abrahams@acm.org> [01-27-04 13:37]:
> On Monday 26 January 2004 10:25 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Rem P Roberti <remegius@comcast.net> [01-26-04 22:02]:
>
> - - - - -
>
> > Well, I have corrected your top-posting and trimmed the superfluous
> > full quote under. Please don't top post and trim your posts.
>
> What is top-posting? And what practices do you advocate about trimming
> messages to which one is responding? I don't think there's any agreed-upon
> convention about this.
Answering at the top of a mail and sending. Top-posting promotes full
quoting since most people do not look any further. And how do you
carry on a conversation when you answer questions before they are asked?
> My approach is to put the original message first (to set the context) and to
> trim most everything from it that isn't relevant to the response.
Sounds good to me. We have a plan.
-- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] Top posting"
- In reply to: Paul W. Abrahams: "[SLE] Top posting (WAS: Re: [SLE] Printing quality)"
- Next in thread: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] Top posting (WAS: Re: [SLE] Printing quality)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|