Re: [SLE] little problem with reiserfs and bad blocks

From: c_nelson77 (c_nelson77_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/30/04

  • Next message: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Mozilla 1.6 versus Mozilla 1.4" 
    To: Anders Karlsson <anders@trudheim.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:37:31 -0700

    Yes I have, it keeps failing because of the bad blocks.

    On Friday 30 January 2004 04:34, Anders Karlsson wrote:
    > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 11:11, c_nelson77 wrote:
    > > I have a drive that failed fsck after a power outage. I find out it
    > > reported bad blocks, and so fsck can't do it's thing. Now that drive is
    > > data, the bulk of it replaceable with a lot of time. (70 gigs, what can I
    > > say, I'm a pack rat)
    > >
    > > But anyways. I would like to be able to get this drive usable and salvage
    > > what I can. Using the badblock command, it reports 4 blocks bad. I have
    > > yet to find anything usefull on bad blocks, etc with reiserfs. Heck, I
    > > think if I could just force mount it, I should get most of it right?
    > >
    > > Any help here? I know ext2/3, fat, fat32, hpfs, ntfs, all have ways to
    > > deal with this, but I have yet to find anyone in linux w/ reiserfs.
    >
    > Have you tried running 'resierfsck --rebuild-tree' ? 

    -- 
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
  • Next message: Art Fore: "Re: [SLE] Mozilla 1.6 versus Mozilla 1.4"