Re: [SLE] NIS, NIS+, Automount which combinations work

From: Steven T. Hatton (hattons_at_speakeasy.net)
Date: 01/30/04

  • Next message: Damian O'Hara: "Re: [SLE] Mozilla 1.6 versus Mozilla 1.4"
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:16:56 -0500
    
    

    On Friday 30 January 2004 15:44, Dylan wrote:
    > On Friday 30 January 2004 20:03 pm, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
    [snip]
    > It doesn't. but works well with it. It may be a dependency, but
    > automount (actually autofs) is independent of NIS.
    All I know is that when I had NIS installed and configured, I could
    cd /net/<hostname?>/directory/path, but that stopped working when I blew away
    the NIS configuration.

    > If you are thinking
    > of using it then I'd reccomend getting the latest autofs4 from
    > www.kernel.org.
    There was a time I always built my own kernel, but it started requiring
    thought, and that was more than I could handle. I hope that is bundled in
    the eagerly awaited 2.6.x kernel rpms from SuSE. My last try resulted in no
    network connection, so I rolled back.

    [snip]
    > NIS+ is only available as a client - SFAIK there is no Linux server for
    > it, only a Solaris one. Can't say any more about it that that...

    I /believe/ yp is actually NIS+.
    > NIS works well, but you may need to hack the makefile to get it to
    > distribute non-standard autofs maps. I simply added the necessary
    > sections for my setup and it worked fine. There is no encryption on the
    > passwords, so it shouldn't be used on an open or untrusted network.

    I recall looking at something in the SuSE distribution, late one night, over a
    year ago that purported to be a means of using PKI (Primary Key
    Infrastructure) and/or encryption with NIS/YP and/or NFS. All I recall
    clearly is the package had the fingerprints of one of the SuSE old-timers all
    over it, and it consisted of little more than C header files.

    > Autofs3 doesn't (IME, YMMV) work well, especially with NIS. autofs4 (and
    > I really do suggest getting the latest build) functions as described -
    > I share all the autofs configs with NIS over 8 boxes without problems -

    I don't believe I have had Autofs4 working, but as I say, it's been over a
    year since I dug into this.

    > NFS has some peculiarities - it doesn't co-exist well with reiserfs, no
    > matter what people say about the problems being fixed. Security is
    > basic to say the least, but if you configure it sensibly you should be
    > safe on a closed network. It's not easy to get it running through NAT,
    > to the extent that I wouldn't bother trying (again, YMMV.) Also, it's
    > picky about whitespace in the /etc/exports file, and the file locking
    > is not what it should be!

    I do recall reading so sun documentation on NIS+/NFS and encryption, but that
    was back in the 20th century.

    > HTH

    It forces me to think... Oh wait, I said I didn't want to do that. ;-)
    Actually, I'm taking a breather from learning to use SOAP and AXIS*, and
    looking at the SuSE 9.0 book's networking sections.

    * http://ws.apache.org/axis/

    BTW, if any of the Novell folks out there in Happy Valley are listening,
    there are three requirements for any kind of network solution that involves
    first level administrators or users directly. User interface, user interface
    and user interface.

    > Dylan

    STH

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Damian O'Hara: "Re: [SLE] Mozilla 1.6 versus Mozilla 1.4"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] NIS, NIS+, Automount which combinations work
      ... > that is bundled in the eagerly awaited 2.6.x kernel rpms from SuSE. ... > My last try resulted in no network connection, ... > User interface, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: NIS (client) issues...
      ... Both using Suse 9.1 Professional. ... I've read the NIS How-To. ... > There was an error setting up inter-process communications for KDE. ... procedures, if I log any of the network users in using TWM instead of KDE, ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • 9.2 Networking/Internet
      ... I have a Toshiba Tecra 8200 with an Intel Pro 100 network card built in. ... Due to assorted problems getting my machine to boot, the initial install ... of SUSE was done from nfs from a friend's machine. ... Configured routes for interface eth0: ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: [SLE] What to do at School
      ... > The switchover to Linux, Suse 9.1 specifically, is a done deal. ... > now is a RedHat Linux server spoofing an NT domain for authentication ... The Unix way would NFS for shares, and NIS for authentication. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Networking 2 XP Pro systems w/ crossover cable
      ... running on both machines. ... This has really got me confused.....I have ran the network setup>>wizard on both computers choosing the appropriate settings for each system. ... Computer B has NIS 2003 ... make sure the browser service is running on each computer. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)