Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord
From: John Andersen (jsa_at_pen.homeip.net)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: John Andersen: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- In reply to: David Krider: "[SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Next in thread: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Reply: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:52:41 -0900
On Friday 30 January 2004 18:32, David Krider wrote:
> Post mortem: I stared at my navel for a few minutes and downgraded to
> the k_smp-2.4.20-100 kernel. That was it. It's apparently been that long
> since I tried to burn a disc. I still say that there's no excuse for
> this. Why did a security fix break burning CD's? Who knows. Again, this
> sort of thing is pretty hardware-specific, I know. Aaaargh!
I'm running 2.4.21-121-smp4G on a older dual Celeron, and some time
ago (a couple of kernels ago actually) they broke something in scsi
so that my tape-backup can't sense and of tape anymore.
Wrote to Mantel about it, (its one of his kernels) but no answer.
-- _____________________________________ John Andersen -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: John Andersen: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- In reply to: David Krider: "[SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Next in thread: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Reply: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|