Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails
From: Peter Onion (Peter.Onion_at_btinternet.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- In reply to: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Next in thread: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Reply: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Anders Johansson <andjoh@rydsbo.net> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:20:03 +0000
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 17:01, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 31 January 2004 17.47, Peter Onion wrote:
> > Signature check for patch info files failed.
> > Cannot load patch information
> >
> > Patch: xf86tools-44811
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone had similar problems ?
>
> Yes.
>
> Check if rpm can see the suse build key, with
>
> rpm -qa gpg-pubkey*
>
> If you get (at least) gpg-pubkey-9c800aca-39eef481 then your problem is
> something else.
Thanks for the reply.
I do get that key, but also another one. Should I get only one ?
Peter
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Philipp Thomas: "Re: [SLE] k_smp-2.4.20-102 deemed harmful to cdrecord"
- In reply to: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Next in thread: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Reply: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] YOU on SuSE 9.0 fails"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
