[SLE] chkroot claims top infected
From: David Herman (mesamoo115_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: Bob Pearson: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- Next in thread: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Reply: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Reply: Togan Muftuoglu: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:31:20 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
SuSE 9.0
Just ran chkroot (chkrootkit-0.43, Sat Dec 27 2003) and it gave the
results
Checking `top'... INFECTED
and
Checking `lkm'... You have 5 process hidden for ps command
I found these commands were in an rpm updated w/ synaptic recently,
ps_2003.11.17-18_i586.rpm. The file can be found at
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/SuSE/9.0-i386/RPMS.suse-people
I renamed top, re-installed the rpm but chkroot still shows the same
result.
top's size is 81.5kb and has a modified date of 2004-01-20
#top -h
top: procps version 3.1.14
Is this an issue or is chkroot being fooled by the newer version?
I'm also curious about the "Checking `lkm'... You have 5 process hidden
for ps command" result. Whats up with that?
Thanks for your ideas
- --
dh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQ***/R+BwgxlylUsJARAixkAJ47XBzOML9Qzca7NlfD2+sIcLbqKwCfWdwJ
yplVdSAhtYrWMShy37v/jfk=
=h9Le
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Bob Pearson: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- Next in thread: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Reply: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Reply: Togan Muftuoglu: "Re: [SLE] chkroot claims top infected"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]