Re: [SLE] little problem with reiserfs and bad blocks
From: by way of c_nelson77 (c_nelson77_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/31/04
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- Maybe in reply to: c_nelson77: "[SLE] little problem with reiserfs and bad blocks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:42:28 -0700 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Anychance you can help me down this path a little more? What is it I am
suppose to do? I found this:
http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl8_hdparm.htm
The best thing I see is "-D Enable/disable the on-drive defect management
feature"
Coudl you elaborate on what I should do?
Thank you.
-Cody
On Friday 30 January 2004 05:46, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> The Friday 2004-01-30 at 04:11 -0700, c_nelson77 wrote:
> > Any help here? I know ext2/3, fat, fat32, hpfs, ntfs, all have ways to
> > deal with this, but I have yet to find anyone in linux w/ reiserfs.
>
> That's right, reiserfs can not handle badblocks. ext273 can. There is a
> way to do it manually, but I don't like it (fsck will remove the hack).
>
> However, possibly your HD firmware can move badbloks elsewere, transparent
> to any OS. This is enabled with hdparm, and the log/status can be seen
> with smartctl. Relocation of bad sectors happens when trying to write to a
> bad sector (but not on reading).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Carlos Robinson
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: [SLE] Comcast and NAT"
- Maybe in reply to: c_nelson77: "[SLE] little problem with reiserfs and bad blocks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]