Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime
From: S.R.Glasoe (srglasoe_at_comcast.net)
Date: 02/06/04
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] mail via command line"
- In reply to: Togan Muftuoglu: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Next in thread: Daryl Lee: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Reply: Daryl Lee: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: SuSEList <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:42:22 -0600
On Thursday 05 February 2004 18:40, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> * Daryl Lee; <dlee@altaregos.com> on 05 Feb, 2004 wrote:
> >According to /proc/uptime, my server restarted a couple of days ago. I
> >have a network up/down log that shows no activity in that time frame.
> >Also, my user account stayed logged on, with the same apps open from
> >well before that time. In other words, if it weren't for /proc/uptime,
> >I have no symptoms of a reboot.
>
> and you were almost to count 50 days. :-)
>
> --
>
> Togan Muftuoglu |
Ah, c'mon Togan, tell him about the new time slicer that cuts down the uptime
counter in favor of more clock ticks for a speedier desktop experience.
This was explained on this list by someone just last week I believe. Search
the archive via google...
Stan
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] mail via command line"
- In reply to: Togan Muftuoglu: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Next in thread: Daryl Lee: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Reply: Daryl Lee: "Re: [SLE] /proc/uptime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
