Re: [SLE] Can XP ICS support SuSe DHCP?

gchris_at_bellsouth.net
Date: 02/28/04

  • Next message: qrn_Hansen?=: "Re: [SLE] Can XP ICS support SuSe DHCP?"
    Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:30:47 -0500
    To: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@acm.org>
    
    

    "Paul W. Abrahams" wrote:
    >
    > On Friday 27 February 2004 9:56 pm, gchris@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > Örn Hansen wrote:
    > > > A router is a cheap box, that doesn't draw much electricity and is quite
    > > > stable. It's a cheap, but relyable solution. Your problem doesn't have
    > to
    > > > be, because MS has made it's own proprietary DHCP solution which isn't
    > > > interoperaple with standard DHCP clients ... but the router thing, is a
    > good
    > > > solution none the less and is guaranteed to work.
    > > >
    > > You are absolutely correct from an engineering point of view. If this
    > > network was starting from scratch your approach is certainly the correct
    > > one. Unfortunately, this is a working, existing network where Linux is
    > > trying to become a player. The network works to M$ defined standards
    > > (which admittedly are proprietary). The question is, can Linux work
    > > in this environment or must the network be redesigned to accommodate one
    > > Linux box? My thinking is that if Linux expects to take desktop business
    > > away from M$ it had better be able to be a "drop in" replacement.
    > >
    > > I fully agree that a dedicated router is a far more reliable solution
    > > than anything based on a PC, whether it is running Linux or Windows.
    > > But the first question to be answered is "Will a Linux box work here?",
    > > not "How should the network be designed?".
    >
    > Seems that the choice between a dedicated $50 router box and a computer that
    > provides an ICS-style interface depends on the context.
    >
    > Paul Abrahams
    >
    Well put Paul and the context here is that we have an ICS box and no
    router, so can the Linux box co-exist with ICS using DHCP or do I have
    to take a step backward and configure it manually. From the looks of my
    inbox, I know this is not the best or most popular approach but I'm still
    hopeful that a simple configuration screwup on my part is responsible
    for making an easy task difficult.
    Chris

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: qrn_Hansen?=: "Re: [SLE] Can XP ICS support SuSe DHCP?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ETH0 problem - SIS900/PC-Chips Mobo.
      ... > Linux NIC Problem: ... > The linuxbox is to part of my home network and I simply want the linuxbox to ... > Paul Bankier, UK. ... I would put a PCI network card such as an Intel Pro100 in your machine. ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • Re: [SLE] Can XP ICS support SuSe DHCP?
      ... > You are absolutely correct from an engineering point of view. ... Unfortunately, this is a working, existing network where Linux is ... of the ICS service range, and then specify the ICS computer as the gateway. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: General
      ... understand the why of the ActiveSync quality issues. ... Paul T. ... We can safely say the ROM upgrade was irrelevant to the problem ... of stuff that interacts with network adapters on your PC. ...
      (microsoft.public.pocketpc.activesync)
    • Re: General
      ... Paul T. ... It sounds to me like there is a problem with the ROM update for your ... of stuff that interacts with network adapters on your PC. ... anti-virus/anti-scripting programs from dozens of vendors, ...
      (microsoft.public.pocketpc.activesync)
    • Re: Is my system secure? What else should I do?
      ... > network functionality for my computing activities (browsing, ... My network shows No presence to the outside world, ... browsing and open for secure browsing. ... Linux is no longer protecting the other computers/devices on your local ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)