Re: [SLE] VMWorkstation 4.0.5 and kernel 2.4.21-192 again

From: Martin Mielke (martin.mielke_at_thales-is.com)
Date: 03/08/04

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Bounced e-mails"
    Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:13:21 +0100
    To: SuSE Linux List <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    
    

    Hi all,

    could anyone please post the links to download both the "any-any patch"
    and the 2.4.21-192-default kernel? I just found this
    http://ftp.leo.org/download/pub/comp/os/unix/linux/suse/suse/i386/update/9.0/rpm/i586/k_deflt-2.4.21-192.i586.rpm
    but it seems to be the pre-compiled kernel, not the sources I need...

    TIA,

    Martin

    Alex Angerhofer wrote:

    >Okay. /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-99 is the original source version that came on
    >your 9.0 discs. You obviously have to update those as well after you
    >updated the binary kernel. I suggest you mosey over to YOU and get that
    >kernel-source package updated so its version corresponds to your current
    >binary, 2.4.21-192.
    >
    >Best regards, Alex.
    >
    >On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Charles wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>duh,,, that one.. Yea.. I have that one installed.. and it still asks
    >>me.. its odd, I even tell it
    >>
    >>/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-99/include
    >>or
    >>/usr/src/linux/include
    >>
    >>But I still get..
    >>
    >>The path "/usr/src/linux/include" is an existing directory, but it does
    >>not contain at least one of these directories "linux", "asm", "net" as
    >>expected.
    >>
    >>--Charles
    >>
    >>

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Bounced e-mails"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] YOU kernel update
      ... On Thursday 20 November 2003 22:32, Alex Angerhofer wrote: ... > been discussed how to install the kernel update as YOU is obviously not ... > going to update the running kernel, and I remember that the procedure has ... Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] YOU kernel update
      ... On Thursday 20 November 2003 07:32 pm, Alex Angerhofer wrote: ... > been discussed how to install the kernel update as YOU is obviously not ... > going to update the running kernel, and I remember that the procedure has ... YOU has absolutely no problem updating a running kernel - but the ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] 192 Kernel Breaks VMware?
      ... On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 11:33, Alex Angerhofer wrote: ... I haven't had the time to dig deeper into it at this ... I am currently running the 166 kernel version with the modules supplied ... unix user since 1989 ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: RT patch acceptance
      ... judge the complexity of a design for that type of system. ... claim that you cannot judge the complexity of a kernel modification. ... Since the patch in question doesn't actually need that information to ... nanokernel's API up to date with additions to Linux's API that RT people ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • [RFC] Making percpu module variables have their own memory.
      ... Someone using the -rt patch found that one of the tracing options caused ... 64K for every CPU to cover all the per_cpu variables used in the kernel ... static void wakeup_softirqd_prio ...
      (Linux-Kernel)