Re: [SLE] Hacked?
From: Lucky Leavell (susemisc_at_UniXpress.com)
Date: 05/03/04
- Previous message: David Rankin: "[SLE] OT ( was Re: [SLE] SuSE 9.1 and YaST License)"
- Next in thread: pinto: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Reply: pinto: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 12:35:24 -0400 (EDT) To: "[SLE]" <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> My guess is that you have a reiserfs partition, and that it is corrupted.
> Reboot form the CD, enter rescue system, and run "reiserfsck" on your
> partition. Follow its advices.
>
Yes it is the [default] reiserfs. I have done quite a bit of research on
Linux FSes since posting this and wish there were a clear choice. I guess
all I can do is try each (particularly xfs and jfs) and see which gives
the most reliable FS.
I understand the need to boot from a rescue CD/floppy to repair a FS but
can, for example, reiserfsck --check be run on a running system or does
even that require using the rescue system? (I read the man page on
reiserfsck and could not find the answer.)
Thank you,
Lucky Leavell
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: David Rankin: "[SLE] OT ( was Re: [SLE] SuSE 9.1 and YaST License)"
- Next in thread: pinto: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Reply: pinto: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Reply: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] Hacked?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]