Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?
From: Joseph Loo (jloo_at_acm.org)
Date: 06/09/04
- Previous message: Saskman: "Re: [SLE] I've got a plan to fix USB hotplugging!"
- In reply to: Jerome R. Westrick: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Next in thread: Leendert Meyer: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Reply: Leendert Meyer: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-mail <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:27:44 -0700
I noticed another thing with Suse 9.1. It seems if you have a jfs for
both / and /boot there seems to be a problem on reboot. I have found
that it marks my filesystem as read only. When I converted (reinstall)
with reisfs, the system seems to work fine.
I did fine that under root, KDE has frozen the system. It does seem that
the USB devices does call instability of the system and may prevent the
system to reboot.
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 06:20, Jerome R. Westrick wrote:
> IMHO:
>
> SuSE 9.0 (was really 8.3)
> SuSE 9.1 (is really 9.0)
>
> I've had several issues with 9.1,
> but not on my server.
>
> Removing the Desktop stuff
> (USB memory sticks, USB Disks, TV-Cards,
> smb:/ url in konquror)
>
> It's been stable a stable server.
>
> I'd hoped for better support for sata drives
> which is why updated so early in the first
> place but was disapointed there...
>
> I've been running my server as:
> NFS server, SSH server, Firewall, Mail server
> MS Domain server since the day after SuSE released
> the German Box. And have had no problems (other
> than the stuff mentioned above).
>
> Summary:
> 9.1 is a rock solid server, (as was/is 9.0)
>
> Jerry Westrick (Basel)
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 13:24, Per Jessen wrote:
> > Starting with 8.0, I believe I noticed a slight drop in the quality of the SuSE
> > distro. 8.1 picked up again, but led me to think it is probably better not to
> > go with a dot-0 release.
> > I've had 9.0 installed on the odd testbox, and we're now contemplating 9.1, so
> >
> > would anyone care to comment on the overall quality of 9.1? The intended use is
> > as a server. I guess what I'm looking for is basically a show of hands - is
> > 9.1 a rock-solid, production-ready distro right now, out-of-the-box?
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> > Per Jessen, Zurich
> >
-- Joseph Loo jloo@acm.org -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Saskman: "Re: [SLE] I've got a plan to fix USB hotplugging!"
- In reply to: Jerome R. Westrick: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Next in thread: Leendert Meyer: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Reply: Leendert Meyer: "Re: [SLE] anyone care to comment on 9.1 as a server platform in general?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|