Re: [SLE] APT & Reiserfs
From: Joaquin Villanueva (joaquin_at_liga-acb.es)
To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:42:09 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Try with apt-get -f install. This must resolve the unmet dependencies. But it
only works if the right repositories are defined in sources.list. Have you
checked the presence of base, update and security (at least these) in your
security.list and sources.list files?
This error message appears when apt is unable to locate a dependency in his
package lists and there is no entry in the installed rpm database for this
dependency. Check also the correctness of the rpm database (rpm --rebuild).
Maybe is corrupted as a result of your EXT3 problems.
ReiserFS is a good option. I'm using it since SuSE 8.1, and is a rock-solid
FS. No problem with it until now. And very fast.
El Viernes, 18 de Junio de 2004 05:17, C Hamel escribió:
> I have had to dump everything & reinstall for the 2nd or 3rd time because
> of a corrupt EXT3 file system. the fsck command will not fix it --fact is,
> fsck reported having fixed it on three different occasions over the last
> two days.
> At any rate, I am now on reiserfs & APT keeps giving me errors where it
> once just d/l the pkgs I needed w/o discussion. I am using the same
> config, same sourcelist which I saved to disk. Output follows:
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> MPlayer: Depends: liblzo.so.1 but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
> This is a *clean* installation, and 'apt-get update' has been run
> successfully, according to output. There were no errors. I just don't get
> it, since I have never had this problem before now.
> Any help appreciated. Thanks!
> SuSE 9 Works
> Linux user# 313696
> Linux box# 199365
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: email@example.com