Re: [SLE] 9.1 is sloooooowwww

From: BandiPat (penguin0601_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 06/28/04

  • Next message: Michael W.Cocke: "Re: [SLE] 9.1:Quickcam Pro 4000" 
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:47:25 -0400

    On Monday 28 June 2004 01:14 am, Fred Miller wrote:
    > On Saturday June 26 2004 2:20 pm, BandiPat wrote:
    >
    > [snip]
    >
    > > Then my first guess would be that short between the keyboard and
    > > chair Fred, as I have setup a customer's machine, 533mhz Celeron,
    > > and it's quite nice, even using the built-in graphics!  Not
    > > something that I would want to use, but adequate just the same and
    > > again comparable or better than when it had 8.2 or 9.0 installed.
    >
    > Congrats......it's rare. I can't tell you how many installs
    > I've....they're ALL slow to varying degrees. My guess is the cause is
    > the 2.6 kernel and AT LEAST some modules if not all.
    >
    > Fred
    ===========

    Or it could be all that "superior" hardware you get, while the rest of
    use this old SiS stuff that won't work. Oh wait a minute, mine does
    work! And well it does. :o)

    I'm sure the 2.6 kernel introduce many new things to us and could affect
    different hardware differently, but everything I've installed on thus
    far is very sweet running.

    Lee 

    -- 
 --- KMail v1.6.2 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.1 ---
	Registered Linux User #225206
 On any other day, that might seem strange...
-- 
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
  • Next message: Michael W.Cocke: "Re: [SLE] 9.1:Quickcam Pro 4000"