Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba
From: Miguel Angelo Rozsas (rozsas_at_supernet.com.br)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Fred Miller: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 is sloooooowwww"
- In reply to: C Hamel: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Next in thread: Marek Chlopek: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Reply: Marek Chlopek: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Reply: C Hamel: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:26:06 -0300
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 14:12, C Hamel wrote:
> It seems to me you may have forgotten to specify port 139 be left
> available. If you do not specify it, that port is closed. I had the same
> trouble and it took me quite awhile before it suddenly dawned on me. :-\
> <LOL>
Hi !
The port 139 IS the netbios-ssn service, as you can check in
the /etc/services file.
In SuSEFirewall2 I can not specify a port by the number, only by
respective service name. And netbios-ssn is allowed in TCP services, in the
expert dialog.
Anyone can confirm this ?
[]s,
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Fred Miller: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 is sloooooowwww"
- In reply to: C Hamel: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Next in thread: Marek Chlopek: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Reply: Marek Chlopek: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Reply: C Hamel: "Re: [SLE] Firewall x Samba"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]