Re: [SLE] Anyone tried the new -95 kernel?
From: Ben Rosenberg (red.kryptonite_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/05/04
- Previous message: g.lams_at_itcilo.org: "Re: [SLE] https - :D"
- In reply to: Fred Miller: "Re: [SLE] Anyone tried the new -95 kernel?"
- Next in thread: Blue Moose IT Support: "Re: [SLE] Anyone tried the new -95 kernel?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 00:11:06 -0700 To: fmiller@lightlink.com
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:48:47 -0400, Fred Miller <fmiller@lightlink.com> wrote:
> I updated tonight via YOU - new kernel and all went well, but no performace
> gain.
Umm. I thought it was just fixes for the kernel that fixed the
security issues. I wasn't aware there was suppose to be a performance
boost with the -95 version.
-- "There is no need to teach that stars can fall out of the sky and land on a flat Earth in order to defend religious faith." -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: g.lams_at_itcilo.org: "Re: [SLE] https - :D"
- In reply to: Fred Miller: "Re: [SLE] Anyone tried the new -95 kernel?"
- Next in thread: Blue Moose IT Support: "Re: [SLE] Anyone tried the new -95 kernel?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
