Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2
From: Jeffrey Laramie (suse-linux-e_at_Trans-Star.net)
Date: 11/17/04
- Previous message: Ben Higginbottom: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- In reply to: Joe Polk: "[SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Next in thread: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Reply: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Reply: Rhugga: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:15:08 -0500
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 09:01, Joe Polk wrote:
> Q:
> Seeing as trying to get an NVidia card to work with SuSE is a cruel joke,
> what is the best alternative? Are ATI Radeon's any easier? I'm going
> through enough just to install 9.2 (mysterious "error occurred during
> installation"). To have to fight the NVidia install is exasperating. I'm
> willing to buy another card for simplicity's sake.
I had no trouble installing an ATI Radeon 9600. It was recognized and
correctly configured during installation. The only problem I have is that 3D
hardware acceleration wasn't available, so no Unreal Tournament :-(( Their
site said they were working on 3D accel. for Linux but I don't know how soon
that may be available.
Jeff
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Ben Higginbottom: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- In reply to: Joe Polk: "[SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Next in thread: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Reply: BandiPat: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Reply: Rhugga: "Re: [SLE] Best video card, SuSE 9.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|