Re: [SLE] which suse distrib do you prefer?

From: Bahram Alinezhad (alineziad_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/30/04

  • Next message: Jim Sabatke: "Re: [SLE] Compare Mozilla and Firefox"
    Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:01:19 -0800 (PST)
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    
    

    I've always recommended people to use the last version
    of linuces, due to its fast development and
    improvement; Really sorry to hear these!

    Thank you for your notice,
    Bahram Alinezhad,
    Rudehen, Tehran, Iran.

    ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "Synthetic Cartoonz" (synthetoonz@bellsouth.net)
    wrote:
    ----------
    I started at 8.0 Professional, and bought every SuSE
    Professional version since. I use the most peculiar
    hardware I have -- my HP5295 laptop -- as the index of
    success for the distro.

    With 8.0 Pro hardly anything worked on the laptop. No
    sound, the CD burner wouldn't burn, USB wasn't
    functioning worth a darn, and the LAN wasn't working.
    At that time I had just bought into running Linux
    after experiencing the third Windows implosion on the
    laptop in a year. So, the lack of working stuff in
    8.0 left me slightly disappointed. But, I managed to
    eventually make the LAN work, and figured that sooner
    or later I or someone else would figure out how to get
    the rest of the hardware running in this or the next
    version of SuSE.

    8.1 Pro and 8.2 Pro saw progressive improvements. In
    8.1 the LAN worked immediately after the install,
    sound and the CD-Burner also started working, tough
    sound was sometimes sporadic. USB required some
    personal hacking on a device by device basis. In 8.2,
    the sound stopped working, but USB support increased
    dramatically. Most thing I shoved into the USB port
    would mount without magic incantations.

    I think 9.0 Pro was really intended to be 8.3 Pro, but
    SuSE appeared to need to engage in Version Number Wars
    with other distros. That was the BEST version so
    far. Everything worked on the laptop. Sound was
    working without issue this time, and everything I
    needed was working happily. Some of the power
    management things didn't work so well, but I wasn't
    concerned with that, since I don't normally use the
    laptop without the AC power plugged in.

    I think 9.1 Pro is the originally intended 9.0 Pro. I
    get the "dot oh" feeling of being used as someone's
    unpaid beta tester. Everything is working, but
    sometimes it works strangely. USB is the biggest
    problem: USB devices sometimes move locations, so I
    end up having to remove and recreate icons on the
    desktop to make mounting/opening/browsing the devices
    convenient.
    Hotplugging USB devices often takes an irritatingly
    long time to recognize that something was plugged in.
     USB performance and reliability also took a nosedive.
     Devices that were working fine with 9.0 have
    intermittent I/O errors. Most annoying. Some recent
    patches and updates have fixed something, because I'm
    having far fewer I/O errors. (USB throughput still
    stinks.)
    Otherwise, the only improvement I see in 9.1 is that
    the power management features (that I don't care
    about) appear to be functioning much better.

    I just picked up SuSE Pro 9.2 yesterday at CompUSA and
    it is still on the floor next to my desk. Various
    computer parts are winging their way to me from a
    variety of Internet sellers as I write this. In the
    next week I plan to use 9.2 to build a file and print
    server for my personal linux boxes in the house (and
    my wife's nasty Win 98 box.) When that is done I'll
    start upgrading the other linux systems. to 9.2.
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<-

                    
    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
    http://my.yahoo.com

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Jim Sabatke: "Re: [SLE] Compare Mozilla and Firefox"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Adding external sound card to laptop
      ... The complaints I've made about the laptop's sound have to do with how bad stuff like streaming audio sounds, or how the sound effects of a game come out on the speakers. ... these are external speakers plugged into the audio output - they are not the built-in speakers in the laptop. ... so I'm more familiar with the usb units aimed at that. ...
      (comp.sys.laptops)
    • Re: USB Soundcards-- support in Linux?
      ... ]> I have a laptop with really really attrocious sound -- ... ]> soundcard for the laptop as I use it in demos in class. ... ]> Eg-- Creative Labs USB Soundblaster. ... with the usb sound card plugged in. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Fwd: [SLE] which suse distrib do you prefer?
      ... and bought every SuSE Professional version ... With 8.0 Pro hardly anything worked on the laptop. ... No sound, the CD burner ... wouldn't burn, USB wasn't functioning worth a darn, and the LAN wasn't ...
      (SuSE)
    • HELP!!!!! no sound
      ... i bought my Presario 700 laptop and i found out that the XP pro i got ... with it was counterfiet after i tried to update it i'm not sure if that ... any way my sound is playing but no sound is coming out in any program ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
    • Re: Old laptop as audio "analyzer"
      ... >users who are more interested in euphonic sound for games and movies. ... >"Rightmark Audio Analyzer" software) as a sort of poor man's Audio ... >sound on this laptop is absolute garbage. ... I didn't even know that USB ...
      (rec.audio.pro)