Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?
From: Kastus (NOSPAM_at_tprfct.net)
Date: 11/30/04
- Previous message: Rich3800_at_aol.com: "[SLE] Re: SUSE taking over the world! Finally!"
- In reply to: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Next in thread: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Reply: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:47:04 -0800 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:34:46AM +0000, Sid Boyce wrote:
> No, it's the original
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 278200 2004-11-09 14:09 modules.dep
> barrabas:/ftp/nov04 # rpm -qf /lib/modules/2.6.8-24.3-default/modules.dep
> kernel-default-2.6.8-24.3
No, it is not, it was generated when you ran depmod on 9 November at 14:09.
That explains why you don't see any difference after running depmod.
The original modules.dep from kernel-default-2.6.8-24.3.i586.rpm has the size
281106 bytes and timestamp 2004-10-26 11:49:54.
To verify it, run the command "rpm -qlp --dump kernel-default-2.6.8-24.3.i586.rpm |grep modules.dep"
This is what I'm getting:
/lib/modules/2.6.8-24.3-default/modules.dep 281106 1098816594 9081ca713f99651bb68ba2bb94a7db6c 0100644 root root 0 0 0 X
1098816594 = 2004-10-26 11:49:54
Regards, -Kastus
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Rich3800_at_aol.com: "[SLE] Re: SUSE taking over the world! Finally!"
- In reply to: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Next in thread: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Reply: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] depmod broken in 9.2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
