Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2
From: Doug McGarrett (dmcgarrett_at_optonline.net)
Date: 12/09/04
- Previous message: Sunny: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- In reply to: James F. Pirtle: "[SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey L. Taylor: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Jeffrey L. Taylor: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Steve Kratz: "RE: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Carl William Spitzer IV: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 23:24:47 -0500 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
At 09:55 PM 12/8/2004 -0600, James F. Pirtle wrote:
>Hello list;
>
>Thinking of moving from 9.1 Professional to 9.2 Professional. Any reasons
why
>I shouldn't? Any problems that jump out of nowhere?
>
/snip/
I ran 9.1 for about 4 months without problems, then it crashed and
burned, and I could not fix it. I ran 9.2 for about 3 weeks, and things
started to go repeatedly wrong, and I gave up. The sad story is in the
archives.
A number of folks said that they thought that the Novell version
was half-baked, so maybe it isn't just me that was/is unhappy.
From what I have read on the list, 9.0 was a better version than
either of its descendants, but I never had that one.
I am going to try another brand shortly. (I don't think
it's a hardware problem. I'm running the hated XP Windows on the
same machine without difficulty.) But I do want to go back to Linux,
if and when I can, and I find the ambition to go thru it all again with
another set of rules.
--doug
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Sunny: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- In reply to: James F. Pirtle: "[SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey L. Taylor: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Jeffrey L. Taylor: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Steve Kratz: "RE: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Reply: Carl William Spitzer IV: "Re: [SLE] 9.1 v 9.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
