Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK
From: Jason Joines (joines_at_bus.okstate.edu)
Date: 12/09/04
- Previous message: Brad Bourn: "Re: [SLE] Am I missing something with help?"
- In reply to: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Next in thread: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Reply: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:38:31 -0600 To: SuSE Users <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
Stan Glasoe wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2004 12:56 pm, Jason Joines wrote:
>>Stan Glasoe wrote:
>>>On Thursday 09 December 2004 11:01 am, Jason Joines wrote:
>>>> I just got my SuSE 9.2 Pro DVD yesterday and did a fresh install
>>>>with all the YOU updates on a P4 1.80GHz with 512 MB RAM. I had been
>>>>running 9.1.
>>>>
>>>> The install went smoothly but starting KDE was horrible. It took
>>>>around 10 minutes.
>>>>
>>>>snip <
>>>>
>>>>Jason Joines
>>>I've had to make sure that powersaved was running properly on my system
>>>to avoid that type of behavior. Also check (via right click, Configure)
>>>suseplugger in the systray area. I had to make sure that Directly Start
>>>Application and Start Applications At Login and Do Active Polling were
>>>all off to get decent system response times.
>>>
>>>One thing to try is to reset your YaST time slices and use the 'desktop'
>>>setting in your grub/lilo boot settings. Without desktop in mine, my
>>>system crawls. Others on the list report exactly opposite behavior for
>>>their systems.
>>>
>>>As they say YMMV,
>>>Stan
>> powersaved is running. What do you mean by running properly? Is there
>>some configuration that needs to be changed?
> I managed to get some permissions messed up on powersaved so that it wasn't
> running and that slowed my system. Not sure what or how i did that but it
> took awhile to figure it out
>> I've had suseplugger completely disabled.
>>
>> I did set the time slice stuff to 'desktop'. Everything was twice as
>>slow before that.
>>
>> I don't see anything about desktop stuff in the bootloader
>>configuration. It boots just fine so I don't see how that could matter.
>> It's just KDE that's misbehaving.
> Gnome and XFcce4 and Icewm and others behaved well for me too. Providing the
> following information for the record not to insult your abilities or anything
> like that.
> http://portal.suse.com/sdb/en/2003/10/pohletz_desktop_90.html explains how to
> change that the "desktop" boot paramter.
> http://portal.suse.de/sdb/en/2003/10/90_scheduling.html explains why they are
> doing it and the last paragraph explains the "desktop" boot parameter time
> slicing. This also explains why uptime gets reset every 47+ days I think it
> is instead of the 470+ days it used to be.
>>Jason
>
> Can't think of anything else right now. Unless its something like locate or
> fam churning away in the background. My performance issues seemed to be
> isolated to KDE also. YMMV of course and my issues may not be yours! Keep us
> updated on what you find though.
>
> Stan
>
Thanks for the tip and the links. That was it. I wacked desktop out
of menu.lst and everything is great now.
Thanks again,
Jason Joines
=================================
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Brad Bourn: "Re: [SLE] Am I missing something with help?"
- In reply to: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Next in thread: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Reply: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] 9.2 - KDE and KDE apps very slow - everything else OK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|