Re: [SLE] Farsi [Was: Balmer threatens Asian governments who want to use Linux]

From: Dylan (dylan_at_dylan.me.uk)
Date: 12/16/04

  • Next message: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] Backup utility: does it exist?"
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:23:32 +0000
    
    

    On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 00:18 am, Bahram Alinezhad wrote:
    > ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    > "cwsiv" (cwsiv@juno.com)
    > wrote:
    > ----------
    > I don't speak or read the language.

    Neither do I, but as a linguist with special interest in writing systems
    I might make some comments...

    > I can only
    > recommend general solutions at this point. In Suse
    > you can import and use true type fonts directly. If
    > the fonts you need in Farsi exist in the windows realm
    > then you can use them in Suse. I do not know if your
    > custom distro has the ability to use TTF files.

    Indeed, and there are many relevant fonts available online, either free
    (in one or other sense, or both) or at cost. Unfortunately, just having
    the font doesn't necessarily make the language 'writable' using
    "standard" software (likely especially terminals and text editors).

    >
    > As to the keyboard there are several kinds supported
    > in Suse if you don't find support there is certainly a
    > developer group which can help you. You would need to
    > know the mappings in the hardware etc to create your
    > own.
    >
    > Otherwise you could create a translation program which
    > would remap the signals of a normal KB to Farsi
    > assuming you have the same number of letters.

    Hmmm, there are definitely "Arabic" keyboards, but the concept of
    "number of letters" is not so simple. While English has 26 (52 counting
    upper and lower case) would we say French has 26, or 32, or more
    (taking accented vowels into account.) For European langs with accents,
    the additional characters are encoded separately so that 'ê' is /one/
    character, separate from 'e'. This approach tends to break down for
    systems where the vowels are represented as 'diacritics' (dots, ticks
    and other simple marks above or below a preceding or following
    consonant) as in principle any consonant-vowel combination could occur.
    If English worked like this we'd need at least 136 characters, not
    considering capitals or vowel combinations.

    In some cases (Sanskrit script and its descendents, for example)
    adjacent consonant symbols amalgamate into single composite glyphs
    either according to strict rules or by a common cluster having its own
    symbol (as English used to have a single character for each of the two
    different 'th' sounds [thin vs this].) The permutations can easily
    multiply beyond practical implementation.

    I don't know exactly how the Farsi writing system works, but it's
    certainly not just a simple string of letter symbols the way English
    is.

    Dylan

    > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<-
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your answer, Carl.
    > Since you are not familiar with Farsi, I prefer not to
    > waste your time more on the subject now by explaining
    > why I say Farsi doesn't work properly.
    > I appreciate your notice and help so far, and, follow
    > the subject only if you are inclined.
    > Please notify me if you are willing to help more or
    > can forward me to somebody more acquainted to the
    > subject or language.
    >
    > Thank you for your help,
    > Bahram Alinezhad,
    > Rudehen, Tehran, Iran.
    >
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    > http://mail.yahoo.com

    -- 
    "I see your Schwartz is as big as mine" 
                                      -Dark Helmet
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] Backup utility: does it exist?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: F is evil (was: XML::LibXML UTF-8 toString() -vs- nodeValue())
      ... Your source code consists of Unicode characters encoded in UTF-8 ... American institute to write English texts. ... encoding, whatever encoding it would have been. ... It could not be any other language. ...
      (comp.lang.perl.misc)
    • Re: F is evil (was: XML::LibXML UTF-8 toString() -vs- nodeValue())
      ... Your source code consists of Unicode characters encoded in UTF-8 ... American institute to write English texts. ... encoding, whatever encoding it would have been. ... It could not be any other language. ...
      (comp.lang.perl.misc)
    • Re: Happy Friday..
      ... while hiding behind the computer screens or make fun of my English as the ... English is not the poster's natural language. ... this characters, Even though Sometime someone would learn something along ...
      (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
    • Re: Happy Friday..
      ... while hiding behind the computer screens or make fun of my English as the ... I have never made fun of anyone's English, ... that English is not the poster's natural language. ... this characters, Even though Sometime someone would learn something along ...
      (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
    • Re: Page looks crooked in Mozilla
      ... which is a right-to-left language. ... In Mozilla, the English version ... works fine but the Farsi version looks crooked. ... out what is wrong and I can't (being new to CSS). ...
      (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets)