Re: Fw: [SLE] SuSE 9.2 not quite fully cooked?
From: Doug B (suse_at_hatterhill.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Previous message: Linux: "Re: [SLE] Peter Nikolic Ham licensee"
- In reply to: Doug B: "Re: Fw: [SLE] SuSE 9.2 not quite fully cooked?"
- Next in thread: Martin Deppe: "Re: [SLE] SuSE 9.2 not quite fully cooked?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:18:52 -0600
On Monday 20 December 2004 06:11 pm, Doug B wrote:
> On Monday 20 December 2004 05:19 pm, David Johanson wrote:
> > This has definitely not been my experience as chronicled on this
> > list. What has been surprising to me is the almost total lack of
> > response to the problems I've been detailing such as phantom drives
> > being listed, drives not being found, and apparently total
> > inability to deal with ATAPI zip drives. At this point I'm looking
> > into other distributions. Up through 9.0 I felt like SuSE was THE
> > distribution to own, but I'm beginning to change my opinions more
> > and more with each subsequent release since 9.0
>
> I do have to agree on the zip drive thing. I still haven't looked
> into that. I rarely use the drive any more.
I finally got around to looking into this.
With the old way of do this , the fstab entry looked like:
/dev/hdb4 /media/zip vfat user,defaults 0 0
Well, there is no /dev/hdb4 on this machine. every /dev/hdx had a
fourth partition expect the one my zip was hung on.
I tried create the device, but no luck. Finally I tried /dev/hdb (no
partition number) in fstab:
/dev/hdb /media/zip vfat user,defaults 0 0
I can now read the disk just fine. It has not been repartitioned or
formated. They are the same files on the same partition as when the
drive was in a 9.1 box using /dev/hdb4 (actually hdd4 on that other
box.)
I still think a lot of the flack distros are taking can be traced back
to kernel development. Without a 2.7 testing/development branch,
things move into the 2.6 kernel too quickly.
Have fun!
Doug
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Linux: "Re: [SLE] Peter Nikolic Ham licensee"
- In reply to: Doug B: "Re: Fw: [SLE] SuSE 9.2 not quite fully cooked?"
- Next in thread: Martin Deppe: "Re: [SLE] SuSE 9.2 not quite fully cooked?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|