Re: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows
From: Chris Carlen (crobc_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 02/19/05
- Previous message: Chris Carlen: "Re: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- In reply to: Stephen Furlong: "RE: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- Next in thread: Jeff Pohlmeyer: "Re: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:04:24 -0800 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Stephen Furlong wrote:
> One thing you haven't mentioned (as far as I can see) is the actual hardware
> specifications of the machines?
It doesn't matter. If anything, the Windows VMs should run slower than
the native Linux OSes on the same machine. But they don't when talking
about web surfing.
Also, the real Win2k machine is the same machine as one of the two Linux
boxes. That machine is dual boot.
Oh, but anyway the machines are rather powerfull as web surfing machines
go. The dual-boot is a 1.4GHz Athlon XP1600 with 512MB RAM, and a
2.4GHz Athlon64 3400+ with 1GB RAM (running Suse 9.1 32 bit version).
Both have 100Mb LAN cards. I can get 11MB/s FTP speeds between the
machines, so the LAN hardware is working super.
Good day!
-- _____________________ Christopher R. Carlen crobc@sbcglobal.net SuSE 9.1 Linux 2.6.5 -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Chris Carlen: "Re: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- In reply to: Stephen Furlong: "RE: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- Next in thread: Jeff Pohlmeyer: "Re: [SLE] Linux still surfs slower than Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|