Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative
From: Danny Sauer (suse-linux-e.suselists_at_danny.teleologic.net)
Date: 02/26/05
- Previous message: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] Dosbox and or dosemu, where to start"
- In reply to: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Next in thread: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Reply: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:33:48 -0600
On Friday 25 February 2005 04:16 pm, Randall R Schulz wrote:
[...]
> (*) The one weakness I've experienced more than any other on my SuSE
> Linux system is its vulnerability to a rogue process consuming so much
> memory that everything else gets swapped out and it becomes impossible
> to even kill the errant process.
Clearly, you need more memory. :) Most modern system will accept 2GB, if
not 4 or more. You should have time to kill acroread before it fills up
2GB of physical memory.
--Danny, noting that the kernel starts killing processes when it runs out of
memory...
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Bruce Marshall: "Re: [SLE] Dosbox and or dosemu, where to start"
- In reply to: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Next in thread: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Reply: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] adobe acrobat alternative"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|