Re: [SLE] place for final commands -- nfs mounts
From: Joe Morris (NTM) (Joe_Morris_at_ntm.org)
Date: 03/02/05
- Previous message: AndyYankovich: "[SLE] Win4Lin Pro: Will it keep XP and IE6 vulnerabities secure from attack?"
- In reply to: James D. Parra: "RE: [SLE] place for final commands -- nfs mounts"
- Next in thread: James D. Parra: "RE: [SLE] place for final commands -- nfs mounts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:25:03 -0600 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
James D. Parra wrote:
>chkconfig -a nfs
>insserv: There is a loop between service named and nfs
>nfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:off 5:on 6:off
>
>
>What is happening with named and nfs?
>
Look at the Required-Start line in the scripts. The loop means
inconsistency, one saying it needs something before it another after,
basically a catch 22 situation. Have you changed any Required-Start
lines in any scripts, since it may not be named or nfs but one of their
"requirements".
-- Joe Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Registered Linux user 231871 -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: AndyYankovich: "[SLE] Win4Lin Pro: Will it keep XP and IE6 vulnerabities secure from attack?"
- In reply to: James D. Parra: "RE: [SLE] place for final commands -- nfs mounts"
- Next in thread: James D. Parra: "RE: [SLE] place for final commands -- nfs mounts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
