Re: [SLE] problems with ssh
From: Leendert Meyer (leen.meyer_at_home.nl)
Date: 03/14/05
- Previous message: Joe Morris (NTM): "Re: [SLE] Matrox & SVGA="
- In reply to: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Next in thread: Louis Richards: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Reply: Louis Richards: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:54:02 +0100
On Monday 14 March 2005 17:25, Stan Glasoe wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2005 10:01 am, Leendert Meyer wrote:
> > Why a second firewall? That make things (IMO) unnecessarily complicated.
> > You have proven that. ;) But it is possible that I am completely wrong
> > about this... ;)
>
> Layered security approach. The small SOHO/home firewall/routers can help
> deflect curious crackers and malicious bots. Bad stuff doesn't see a
> Windows machine, they move on. NEVER rely on it but it does help.
...
> port forward
...
> For ssh ALWAYS (and probably most other basic services) choose a different
> external port than 22 and greater than 1024. Its amazing how many hits you
> get on that once you open it up from automated cracker bots testing what
> they hope are common UserIDs and if that works, common passwords.
Yup, I know. But never thought of changing the default port (although I knew
the possibility). Actually I thought of giving the perpetrators the tarpit
treatment.
> Stan
Thanks, Stan, much appreciated.
Cheers,
Leen
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Joe Morris (NTM): "Re: [SLE] Matrox & SVGA="
- In reply to: Stan Glasoe: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Next in thread: Louis Richards: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Reply: Louis Richards: "Re: [SLE] problems with ssh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]