Re: [SLE] RE: [suse-sles-e] Configuring Spamassassin and amavisd-new

From: Carlos E. R. (robin1.listas_at_tiscali.es)
Date: 04/01/05

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] ide_scsi on 9.2??"
    Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 21:33:33 +0200 (CEST)
    To: SLE <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    
    

    The Friday 2005-04-01 at 10:35 -0700, Richard Mixon (qwest) wrote:

    > **** /var/log/mail - BEGIN ****
    > <SNIP>
    > Apr 1 09:24:12 gofish amavis[19362]: (19362-01) Passed,
    > <email1@qwest.net> -> <email1@gofish.acmesoftware.com>, Message-ID:
    > <DKELJBPNDHJEECCAEPGOKEALLEAA.email1@qwest.net>, Hits: 3.584

    Amavis is working, and gave a level of "3.584" to that email.

    > Apr 1 09:24:12 gofish amavis[19362]: (19362-01) TIMING [total 1300
    > ms] - SMTP EHLO: 4 (0%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 0 (0%), mkdir tempdir: 0 (0%),
    > create email.txt: 0 (0%), SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 3 (0%), SMTP DATA: 38
    > (3%), body hash: 1 (0%), mkdir parts: 1 (0%), mime_decode: 15 (1%),
    > get-file-type: 14 (1%), get-file-type: 14 (1%), decompose_part: 2 (0%),
    > decompose_part: 0 (0%), parts: 0 (0%), AV-scan-1: 4 (0%), SA msg read: 2
    > (0%), SA parse: 1 (0%), SA check: 1106 (85%), fwd-connect: 33 (3%),
    > fwd-mail-from: 2 (0%), fwd-rcpt-to: 7 (1%), write-header: 2 (0%),
    > fwd-data: 0 (0%), fwd-data-end: 46 (4%), fwd-rundown: 1 (0%),
    > unlink-2-files: 3 (0%), rundown: 0 (0%)

    You can tell amavis-new not to add this line, it is too verbose. But you
    can see there that it in fact running SA.

    > **** Received message headers - BEGIN ****
    ....
    > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04AC_01C5369C.8624BD80"
    > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
    > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527

    I would try to use a "real" mail program, say Mozilla, for example...

    > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at acme.com

    It has been scanned.

    > **** Received message headers - END ****

     
    > **** /var/log/messages - BEGIN ****
    ...
    > Apr 1 09:22:16 gofish amavis[19360]: ANTI-SPAM code loaded

    Ok.

    > **** /etc/amavisd.conf - BEGIN ****
    > <SNIP>
    ...

    > # default values, can be overridden by more specific lookups, e.g. SQL
    > $sa_tag_level_deflt = 3.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level
    > $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;

    These two are interesting. Info headers are only added if level is more or
    equal to 3.0. You have the explanation below:

    # a quick reference:
    # tag_level controls adding the X-Spam-Status and X-Spam-Level headers,
    # tag2_level controls adding 'X-Spam-Flag: YES', and editing Subject,
    # kill_level controls 'evasive actions' (reject, quarantine, extensions);
    # it only makes sense to maintain the relationship:
    # tag_level <= tag2_level <= kill_level < $sa_dsn_cutoff_level

    So, it will only add the X-Spam-Flag above level 5.0. Your email does not
    get to that level. But you should be seeing the "X-Spam-Status" and
    "X-Spam-Level" headers - unless outlook is playing tricks on you. Change.

    > $sa_kill_level_deflt = $sa_tag2_level_deflt; # triggers spam evasive actions
    > # at or above that level: bounce/reject/drop,
    > # quarantine, and adding mail address extension

    Translation: above level 5.0, it will take "evasive action".

    >
    > $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10; # spam level beyond which a DSN is not sent,
    > # effectively turning D_BOUNCE into D_DISCARD;
    > # undef disables this feature and is a default;

    If I read it correctly, from level 5 to 10, email is bounced, and above 10
    it is discarded. You don't see them at all. I don't like those actions. I
    would never bounce an spam!

    I don't clearly see how to tell it to quarantine always, or to do nothing.
    To do nothing I think would be, perhaps, setting "sa_kill_level_deflt =
    10000"

    I don't see this clear, and I know no documentation. :-/

    -- 
    Cheers,
           Carlos Robinson
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] ide_scsi on 9.2??"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: spamassassin odd scoring
      ... different to the score spamassassin puts in the X-Spam-Status and ... Might the mail be passing through SA twice, so the first time it ... that its headers don't look spammy, ... is that Emacs boots quicker.' ...
      (uk.comp.os.linux)
    • Re: [SLE] spam status
      ... On Sunday 17 April 2005 12:40 am, Matt Gibson wrote: ... The very headers from your message ... it only adds the X-Spam-Status and X-Spam-Level ... It uses a spamassisin module, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Dynamic grouping in reports?
      ... So, I've put a check-box on the form which launches the Invoice report, ... One problem is that the group headers and footer need controls, ...
      (microsoft.public.access.reports)
    • Re: Dynamic grouping in reports?
      ... So, I've put a check-box on the form which launches the Invoice report, and if the box is checked it launches a different report - different only in that it has different subreports, as it's the subreports which have the grouping. ... One problem is that the group headers and footer need controls, ...
      (microsoft.public.access.reports)
    • Re: Dynamic grouping in reports?
      ... So, I've put a check-box on the form which launches the Invoice report, and if the box is checked it launches a different report - different only in that it has different subreports, as it's the subreports which have the grouping. ... One problem is that the group headers and footer need controls, ...
      (microsoft.public.access.reports)