Re: [SLE] fsck when uptime cannot be broken?

From: Carlos E. R. (robin1.listas_at_tiscali.es)
Date: 04/01/05

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] RE: [suse-sles-e] Configuring Spamassassin and amavisd-new"
    Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:52:49 +0200 (CEST)
    To: SLE <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    
    

    The Friday 2005-04-01 at 11:57 +0200, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:

    > I have seen many folk who have signatures stating that the machine has been
    > running for something like 400 days.
    >
    > Whilst I applaud this type of reliability, I am wondering about the actual fs
    > as the machine isn't rebooted so that fsck can check the partitions.
    >
    > I am perhaps paranoid about keeping the fs in tip top shape but it is the
    > basis that we all rely on.

    YES! You are! :-P X'-)

    > so my question is this: Can a system that has such uptime have its all its fs
    > checked and not be rebooted?

    No need to check them... this is linux, stability is the word here ;-)

    > Could a system Linux boot floppy specific to the system be inserted, mounted,
    > and then be told to unmount the running systems partitions listed in the
    > fstab(except the floppy, and fsck them and then re-mount them, without losing
    > the uptime figure?

    Hah! That floppy has no chance. If it is a boot floppy, it can not boot -
    unless you reboot. If it is a program, it has no other access than the
    running system has.

    The only posibility is umount a partition, one that is not used at the
    time, then fsck it. That means that you will never be able to check "/".
    In fact, you can not even check "/home" without login everybody off first.

    The only theoretical posibility would be, when using a raid 1, mirror, and
    puting it in single disk mode (if possible in linux, I don't know). One of
    the halfs would be active, the other could be checked. The problem, and a
    big one, would be when reactivating the raid: files will have changed
    during that time: how can you resync both drives...? a nightmare.

    I know a machine that can do that, kind of, but not a linux machine, and
    not a PC, and with a really huge price tag.

    -- 
    Cheers,
           Carlos Robinson
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] RE: [suse-sles-e] Configuring Spamassassin and amavisd-new"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Windows multiboot (aaargh!)
      ... I've done that with my DOS floppy. ... > seems that creating a Linux boot disk is a rather more complex procedure. ... >> FDISK showing partitions swapped, ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: [SLE] MTAB problem: file exists but is not found
      ... Boot from the rescue CD (or floppy) and run a fsck on your partitions. ... Carlos Robinson ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Well, here goes....
      ... > give you two choices about the mystery partitions: ... > few minutes ago...So, this gets me thinking, if windows can't see it, it ... > Windows boots with nothing in the floppy drive, if I want to boot Linux, ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: linux not booting
      ... I have a linux boot floppy, so I boot the linux system by ... options (or searching the web for fsck). ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: RedHat 9 wont boot
      ... Håkan Larsson wrote: ... > problems and I can't boot into my linux system any longer. ... You could run fsck on these partitions ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)