[SLE] Scanner Problem
From: William H Lugg (wlugg_at_falconbroadband.net)
Date: 04/30/05
- Previous message: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] KDE or Zap not Linux (Was: Interesting review of SuSE 9.3)"
- Next in thread: Ken Schneider: "Re: [SLE] Scanner Problem"
- Reply: Ken Schneider: "Re: [SLE] Scanner Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:43:10 -0600
I've got a USB scanner hooked up to my SuSE 9.2 box. When I first was
installing SuSE I had a problem where it YaST sees the scanner, but Kooka
can't see it. I got help from the list regarding protections that solved the
problem. Now, I normally keep the scanner off unless I'm going to use it.
Today I fired it up and I'm back where I was at the beginning. I get no
errors, and YaST says the scanner is connected, but Kooka can't see it.
What file (or device) needed its ownership (or protections) changed so that
all users can use the scanner? Am I causing a problem by shutting the
scanner off when not in use?
This also brings up another question. I went to the archives to look for the
original email and all I could find was a site with emails separated by
month. There seemed to be no search tool. Is there a way to search the
archives other than by popping into each month and doing a text search? If
that's the only way I could understand why folks don't spend more time
looking in the archives first.
Sorry for rehashing an old topic.
-- Bill Lugg Milstar Software Support Peterson AFB, CO -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Sid Boyce: "Re: [SLE] KDE or Zap not Linux (Was: Interesting review of SuSE 9.3)"
- Next in thread: Ken Schneider: "Re: [SLE] Scanner Problem"
- Reply: Ken Schneider: "Re: [SLE] Scanner Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives
... firewalling and virus protection are done ... antivirus software at all,
and yet in the case of .tar.gz and .tar.bz2 ... writers would be slow to react to viruses transmitted
inside archives ... > some modestly common archive type is a terrible flaw in a scanner.
... (Full-Disclosure) - Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives
... > If virus writers start using these formats AV companies could be slow to ...
If a virus was released that depended on, say tar.gz archives, and some ... regardless
of whether the malware in question self-packs in .RAR, .ZIP, ... OK -- in a gateway
scanner it is likely to be a terrible flaw. ... (Full-Disclosure) - Re: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple AV Vendors ignoring tar.gz archives
... Any vaguely competent gateway scanner should have basic knowledge of ... all
archive formats and should have an option to quarantine all ... messages with archives
in the formats it cannot unpack and inspect. ... not have to detect malware inside an archive.
... (Full-Disclosure) - [Full-Disclosure] Re: Antivirus/Trojan/Spyware scanners DoS [summary]
... to any AV scanner DoS attack. ... believe many people have confusion
with my advisory ... condition when a scanner attempts to extract the ... Usually
files within archives ... (Full-Disclosure) - Re: SECURITY.NNOV: special devices access in multiple archivers
... we, the Anti-Virus Test Team at the University of Magdeburg, have looked at
... we just used "EXE" to make sure a scanner ... both ARJ and ZIP archives,
most other programs are still able to find the ... (Bugtraq)