[SLE] [MAILER-DAEMONUndelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

From: Allen (gorebofh_at_comcast.net)
Date: 05/28/05

  • Next message: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] xorg.conf and XF86Config get mixed up."
    Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 21:17:34 -0400
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    
    

    OK, why is this guy not kicked off this list? There have been multiple
    discussions on the list about this email addy, did anyone send a mail to
     admins?

    ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@linux.local> -----

    X-Original-To: gore@localhost.HPGeeko.org
    Delivered-To: gore@localhost.HPGeeko.org
    X-Originating-IP: [65.173.158.7]
    Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:20:58 -0600 (MDT)
    From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@linux.local>
    Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
    To: gorebofh@comcast.net

    Content-Description: Notification
    This is the Postfix program at host linux.local.

    I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
    below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

    For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

    If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
    delete your own text from the message returned below.

                            The Postfix program

    <gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: deferred transport

    Content-Description: Delivery error report
    Reporting-MTA: dns; linux.local
    Arrival-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:59:52 -0600 (MDT)

    Final-Recipient: rfc822; gbrown@localhost.linux.local
    Action: failed
    Status: 4.0.0
    Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; deferred transport

    Content-Description: Undelivered Message
    Mailing-List: contact suse-linux-e-help@suse.com; run by ezmlm
    Precedence: bulk
    list-help: <mailto:suse-linux-e-help@suse.com>
    list-unsubscribe: <mailto:suse-linux-e-unsubscribe-gbrown=unionavenue.com@suse.com>
    list-post: <mailto:suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    X-MIME-Notice: attachments may have been removed from this message
    X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e
    X-Message-Number-for-archive: 235562
    Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux-e@suse.com
    Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 21:28:04 -0400
    From: Allen <gorebofh@comcast.net>
    To: sle <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    Mail-Followup-To: sle <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    In-Reply-To: <1115432671.20020.4.camel@serpentor.cobrala>
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
    X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at scanhost.suse.de
    X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,
     DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, MY_LINUX
    X-Spam-Level:
    Subject: Re: [SLE] SUSE 9.3: buggy as hell

    On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:24:31PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
    > On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 18:47 -0700, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
    > > On 5/6/05, Preston Crawford <me@prestoncrawford.com> wrote:
    > > > That's very odd. And I guess it proves the point of some other posters
    > > > here, that sometimes some people have bugs that others never ever see.
    > > > Because I've never seen this one. 9.2 has been very smooth for me, on
    > > > the balance.
    > >
    > > Yeah. I kind of figured no one had seen this problem because I posted
    > > to the list a couple times about it and no one responded. :)
    > >
    > > Doesn't matter now.. 9.2 is a bad memory for me.
    >
    > Weird. I'm scared to go to 9.3, personally. I've even thought about NLD.
    > $50 and all. I was thinking about this yesterday and maybe I do need to
    > adopt a mindset similar to what another poster said when they said they
    > install all their own major software. Maybe I just need to find a distro
    > with a solid kernel, GUI and userland and then just install my own
    > software. I kind of did this when I ran Fedora. Relied on them for the
    > basic distro functionality such as the Desktop Manager, web browser,
    > mail client, etc. then installed my own Apache, MySQL, Java, Tomcat,
    > etc.
    >
    > > > the fact that suddenly I had 20 libraries I may never need sitting on my
    > > > machine taking up space. I'll always prefer binary packaging.

    pkg_add -r

    > > We tested FreeBSD with the custom software we are build and Linux was
    > > about 30% faster... which hacked off one of my co-workers who is a
    > > freeBSD person. *laugh*
    >
    > That doesn't shock me. I found it fast for some things, but I've met
    > many in the FreeBSD community who admit it's slower. They'll say it's
    > because of the task switching in FreeBSD being bad and I think they're
    > right. 5.x may be better and faster. But it's still true, regardless of
    > cause.

    5.X is mainly for SMP. The toher improvements they need to concentrate
    with are hardware support / drivers, and something for updates better than
    what they have now.

     
    > > One can do pkgs with Gentoo but then what would be the point to using
    > > it? If one uses the pkgs then it's just an infant Linux distro with a
    > > way smaller userbase the SUSE or RH. :)

    I won't even start on Gentoo. I can't stand it, or their user base.

     
    > Totally.
    >
    > Preston
    >
    >
    > --
    > Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    > For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    > Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    > Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    >
    >

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    ----- End forwarded message -----
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] xorg.conf and XF86Config get mixed up."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] SUSE 9.0 boostrap: Trying to move old root to /initrd ... failed
      ... I created a new install from scratch and left the partitions sized as ... hdc2 swap 1.5 GB ... >Check the headers for your unsubscription address ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] Suse 9.2 - drbd - aktueller SMP Kernel -Problem
      ... If the above steps went ok, you just need to install it. ... Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] SUSE 9.3: buggy as hell
      ... > install all their own major software. ... Maybe I just need to find a distro ... > Check the headers for your unsubscription address ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] release of Suse 9.3 ?
      ... >>Then keep an eye on kernel development. ... > Check the headers for your unsubscription address ... to completely upgrade a distro just because a new version is out. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [SLE] SUSE 9.3 confusion?
      ... the CD install, that are on the DVD/network versions. ... And not including postgresql annoys me:) MySQL has been catching up, ... Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com ...
      (SuSE)