Re: [SLE] named dns

From: Carlos E. R. (robin1.listas_at_tiscali.es)
Date: 05/30/05

  • Next message: suse_gasjr4wd_at_mac.com: "Re: [SLE] Root password corrupt?"
    Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 04:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
    To: SLE <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
    
    

    The Sunday 2005-05-29 at 14:16 -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:

    > Many ISPs provide more than one name server. Does your ISP provide more
    > than one name server (address)? If so, is it possible you've
    > misconfigured the primary, forcing each request to time out once (on
    > the primary server) and then fail over to the secondary where they
    > succeed?

    Possible. But I don't think so. If the first DNS fails timing out, my own
    DNS will time out as well, or at least, take much longer than three
    seconds. I know, in some cases it takes perhaps ten seconds till it
    complains.

    Remember: modem is slow. Providers are slow.

    I can try using the root servers and see if it is faster.
    [...]

    Offline:

      Host nxsecure.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
      Received 30 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 164 ms

    Online:

      Trying "nxsecure.org"
      ...
      Received 113 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 1344 ms
      Trying "nxsecure.org"
      ...
      Received 91 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 313 ms
      Trying "nxsecure.org"
      ...
      Received 129 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 302 ms

    Notice it's got to make three seeks, making a total of 1.959 seconds, a
    bit faster than using my forwarders the other day. Second time (cached):

      Received 113 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 57 ms
      Received 91 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 43 ms
      Received 129 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 45 ms

    I reenable my forwarders, and reload named. First time:

      Received 129 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 2540 ms
      Received 91 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 339 ms
      Received 145 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 342 ms

    That's a total of 3.2", slower than asking the root servers; second
    time (cached):

      Received 129 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 45 ms
      Received 91 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 30 ms
      Received 145 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 45 ms

    Ok, I'll try again; I dissable my forwarders a second time, reload named,
    and retry:

      cer@nimrodel:~> time host -v nxsecure.org
      Received 113 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 3543 ms
      Received 91 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 291 ms
      Received 129 bytes from 192.168.100.2#53 in 300 ms
      
      real 0m4.176s -- and the sum of the above values is 4.134", it
    matches what the comand "time" said.

    You see... four seconds, from the root servers. I didn't try again with
    forwarders enabled, because my connection went down (1 minute timeout).

    Times longer than two seconds for a lookup are very normal, at least in my
    part of the world, when using a modem.

    -- 
    Cheers,
           Carlos Robinson
    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: suse_gasjr4wd_at_mac.com: "Re: [SLE] Root password corrupt?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Slow DNS lookup
      ... > Thanks for your reply Kevin. ... > try using the forwarders you suggested in a previous post. ... but you cannot use the DNS servers you posted as ... Below is a query I tried on the DNS servers you are using, ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
    • Re: Problem with sendmail when using microsoft DNS forwarders
      ... want to disable recursion on your *public* servers, ... The issue of using forwarders is basically orthogonal to this, ... network to have many private servers forwarding to one or a few other ... Can sendmail/bsd/bind/m$ dns just not play together? ...
      (comp.mail.sendmail)
    • Re: Root Hints or forwarders?
      ... > You say to use forwarders but on which servers the internal or DMZ? ... Just be sure to AVOID the "disable recursion" check box in the ... >> cannot reach the Internet even if you forgot to stop such. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
    • Re: dumb dns question
      ... internet access from both sites as the forwarders should normally be set to ... DNS servers. ... > I have 2 SBS Servers at different locations. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Unable to resolve MX-records
      ... > Then I must ask why you would want to use those DNS servers as forwarders? ... I started configuring new servers for WIN 2003. ... reasons I can think of is avoiding a trip to a root server when I can take ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)